NathanLoiselle wrote:*puffs up proudly*
I use a chromebook!
So brave! So heroic!
NathanLoiselle wrote:*puffs up proudly*
I use a chromebook!
Crimson847 wrote:In other words, transgender-friendly privacy laws don't molest people, people molest people.
(Presumably, the only way to stop a bad guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law is a good guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law, and thus transgender-friendly privacy law rights need to be enshrined in the Constitution as well)
cmsellers wrote:Didn't you mention you were close to the point where this company would have to make you permanent and give you a raise?
Crimson847 wrote:In other words, transgender-friendly privacy laws don't molest people, people molest people.
(Presumably, the only way to stop a bad guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law is a good guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law, and thus transgender-friendly privacy law rights need to be enshrined in the Constitution as well)
On Monday, I wrote:I just tried to swipe in at work, and my ID was acting up. I went up to the guy at the desk who gives out guest slips, and he told me I got fired. That would have been nice to know before I woke up at 5:15 and drove all the way down here in below-freezing temperatures, but whatever. (Seriously, at least I’m not emotionally attached to the work or the people.)
Crimson847 wrote:In other words, transgender-friendly privacy laws don't molest people, people molest people.
(Presumably, the only way to stop a bad guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law is a good guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law, and thus transgender-friendly privacy law rights need to be enshrined in the Constitution as well)
cmsellers wrote:So they didn't like you enough to make you permanent, but did like you enough that they fired you and then wanted to restart the clock?
That sucks, I'm sorry.
Crimson847 wrote:In other words, transgender-friendly privacy laws don't molest people, people molest people.
(Presumably, the only way to stop a bad guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law is a good guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law, and thus transgender-friendly privacy law rights need to be enshrined in the Constitution as well)
jbobsully11 wrote:Or “one hand doesn’t know what the other one is doing,” so to speak. In any case, they’re either incompetent or evil, and I’m not putting up with that.
Absentia wrote:jbobsully11 wrote:Or “one hand doesn’t know what the other one is doing,” so to speak. In any case, they’re either incompetent or evil, and I’m not putting up with that.
That's really going to limit your job opportunities, I'm afraid.
Crimson847 wrote:In other words, transgender-friendly privacy laws don't molest people, people molest people.
(Presumably, the only way to stop a bad guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law is a good guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law, and thus transgender-friendly privacy law rights need to be enshrined in the Constitution as well)
Crimson847 wrote:In other words, transgender-friendly privacy laws don't molest people, people molest people.
(Presumably, the only way to stop a bad guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law is a good guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law, and thus transgender-friendly privacy law rights need to be enshrined in the Constitution as well)
jbobsully11 wrote:Absentia wrote:jbobsully11 wrote:Or “one hand doesn’t know what the other one is doing,” so to speak. In any case, they’re either incompetent or evil, and I’m not putting up with that.
That's really going to limit your job opportunities, I'm afraid.
Well, shit. How about just “all the higher-ups know who’s working for them,” then?
If not, I guess I’ll start... growing drugs to sell? That’s how that works, right? tutoring kids in subjects I know, or something.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 25 guests