Crimson847 wrote:In other words, transgender-friendly privacy laws don't molest people, people molest people.
(Presumably, the only way to stop a bad guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law is a good guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law, and thus transgender-friendly privacy law rights need to be enshrined in the Constitution as well)
Crimson847 wrote:In other words, transgender-friendly privacy laws don't molest people, people molest people.
(Presumably, the only way to stop a bad guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law is a good guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law, and thus transgender-friendly privacy law rights need to be enshrined in the Constitution as well)
Crimson847 wrote:In other words, transgender-friendly privacy laws don't molest people, people molest people.
(Presumably, the only way to stop a bad guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law is a good guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law, and thus transgender-friendly privacy law rights need to be enshrined in the Constitution as well)
Kivutar wrote:I'm getting married today.
cmsellers wrote:The Austin Gilbert and Sullivan Society did what they call a concert performance of Patience, which means one show, piano accompaniment instead of a full orchestra, street clothes, and reading from scripts. I went, it was good.
Though they modernized it to explain the street clothes and part of their modernization was that they had hipsters self-identifying as hipsters. Every hipster I have met has very strongly rejected labels, so I cringed every time they did that.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests