Australia wrote:"Why are you calling me Ladki96? My name is Australia."
Well?
Because of poor timing.
*Hopes timing is right and tries again*
So what sort of question would you ask the person above you?
Australia wrote:"Why are you calling me Ladki96? My name is Australia."
Well?
Edgar Cabrera wrote:HOLY SHIT GUYS, IT'S DOGLOVINGJIM!!! HE'S HERE!!!
skoobadive wrote:It's the legendary DoglovingJim! Ohboy, this must be the greatest day of my life!
Cracked.com wrote:Initially, his interest in animals was "primarily a sexual attraction," but as he grew older, he also "developed the emotional attraction." We guess we could call what Jim does ... dog-lovin'
Ladki96 wrote:I would ask if I broke the game :P
Did I break the game?
Edgar Cabrera wrote:HOLY SHIT GUYS, IT'S DOGLOVINGJIM!!! HE'S HERE!!!
skoobadive wrote:It's the legendary DoglovingJim! Ohboy, this must be the greatest day of my life!
Cracked.com wrote:Initially, his interest in animals was "primarily a sexual attraction," but as he grew older, he also "developed the emotional attraction." We guess we could call what Jim does ... dog-lovin'
iMURDAu wrote:Who's going to buy me a PS4 and Monster Hunter World because my laptop is too fragile to play games on comfortably?
Fun With Mr. Fudge wrote:iMURDAu wrote:Who's going to buy me a PS4 and Monster Hunter World because my laptop is too fragile to play games on comfortably?
A monster, so long as you promise not to hunt it.
If a genie offers to grant you one wish, and you wish for infinite wishes, should the genie have to grant it?
Edgar Cabrera wrote:HOLY SHIT GUYS, IT'S DOGLOVINGJIM!!! HE'S HERE!!!
skoobadive wrote:It's the legendary DoglovingJim! Ohboy, this must be the greatest day of my life!
Cracked.com wrote:Initially, his interest in animals was "primarily a sexual attraction," but as he grew older, he also "developed the emotional attraction." We guess we could call what Jim does ... dog-lovin'
A Combustible Lemon wrote:Death is an archaic concept for simpleminded commonfolk, not Victorian scientist whales.
CarrieVS wrote:Is anyone other than me ever going to want to discuss this month's writing contest?
Crimson847 wrote:In other words, transgender-friendly privacy laws don't molest people, people molest people.
(Presumably, the only way to stop a bad guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law is a good guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law, and thus transgender-friendly privacy law rights need to be enshrined in the Constitution as well)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests