So here's the article I'm talking about: http://www.cracked.com/article_22332_10 ... k-315.html
It goes into detail about the week's most shared Cracked stories. By itself, could be interesting, but the whole thing seems REALLY smug and self-satisfied. Also, there's one major, MAJOR problem. Look under the pictures. Is that a comment I see? From the comment section?
So apparently Cracked loves to denigrate the comments as worthless and horrible, except when it's convenient for them. There's also ads; is it even legal to post someone else's work uncredited and make ad revenue off it?
What do you think about this weird little article?