Australia wrote:Down with that theory! That's right, I'm totally down up with that theory. It checks all the boxes for plausibility. It has exclamation marks, repetition AND exclamation marks.
Crimson847 wrote:In other words, transgender-friendly privacy laws don't molest people, people molest people.
(Presumably, the only way to stop a bad guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law is a good guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law, and thus transgender-friendly privacy law rights need to be enshrined in the Constitution as well)
random_nerd wrote:Oct 31 and Dec 25 are equal to each other!
But progressives are starting to wonder if neoliberals’ support is worth the watering-down of their program, and neoliberals are starting to wonder if progressives’ support is worth constantly feeding more power to people they increasingly consider crazy. The Republicans used some weird demonic magic to hold together conservatives and neoliberals for a long time
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests