SandTea wrote:I am genuinely curious as to why people hate the Iran deal. As far as I know, the US lifted sanctions in exchange for a huge detriment to Irans nuclear progress. Calling it a stop gap or bandaid, I can see as being a reasonable assertion but to back out now is to actually allow, yes allow, them to progress towards the goal that ostensibly is what people were objecting to; That it is better to have a non-nuclear capable Iran.
I'm also wondering why Ben Net is trying to get don t to back out also. But all I've gotten for that is some conspiracy theories about future wars and fundie theists hoping for end times.
I'd rather hope Iran gets more moderate over the ten years of the deal than let them, as is, get nukes sooner. Are there reasonable objections I am not aware of other than "Obama did it so it must be bad"?
SandTea wrote:Calling it a stop gap or bandaid, I can see as being a reasonable assertion but to back out now is to actually allow, yes allow, them to progress towards the goal that ostensibly is what people were objecting to; That it is better to have a non-nuclear capable Iran.
Carrie, on hearing of Siphonophores wrote:I heard you like jellyfish, so I put jellyfish in your jellyfish.
Cobra-D wrote:Huh wonder what’s in 2019
A Combustible Lemon wrote:If Trump can negotiate a deal, unless democrats obstructed, it'd actually be a strong deal with democratic guarantees behind it because of passing through congress, instead of Obama's "my-successor-can-unilaterally-break-this" deal. Not that that's likely to happen anyway considering he sounds more like he's ready to start a war, and there's probably a few republicans that still don't fucking want a deal.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests