Crimson847 wrote:In other words, transgender-friendly privacy laws don't molest people, people molest people.
(Presumably, the only way to stop a bad guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law is a good guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law, and thus transgender-friendly privacy law rights need to be enshrined in the Constitution as well)
Absentia wrote:I was supposed to read Moby Dick for school back in the day. Read a chapter, got bored, skimmed the "abridged" version, failed the test. I stand by my decision.
cmsellers wrote:I probably should read Naked Lunch and A Clockwork Orange at some point, though, and neither one had been on my radar, so thank you, unknown librarians?
Crimson847 wrote:In other words, transgender-friendly privacy laws don't molest people, people molest people.
(Presumably, the only way to stop a bad guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law is a good guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law, and thus transgender-friendly privacy law rights need to be enshrined in the Constitution as well)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests