I have a new niece! And she's in driving distance. And I love her.
Zevran wrote:Magic can kill. Knives can kill. Even small children launched at great speeds can kill.
cmsellers wrote:I had an anxiety attack that I was worried might be a heart problem and spent four hours today dealing with it, which sucked. The good news is that I know all my risk factors for heart disease are moving in the right direction. My blood pressure was 104/73 today. It's always been technically "normal," but I have never seen it that low.
But what I think is better news is: I'm not OK with dying. Most of my life, if I thought I might die, I kind of felt like "eh, so much the better, I get shot of this life without guilt." I mean, I think this is good news, but honestly, realizing I actually want to live just feels surreal to me.
Edgar Cabrera wrote:HOLY SHIT GUYS, IT'S DOGLOVINGJIM!!! HE'S HERE!!!
skoobadive wrote:It's the legendary DoglovingJim! Ohboy, this must be the greatest day of my life!
Cracked.com wrote:Initially, his interest in animals was "primarily a sexual attraction," but as he grew older, he also "developed the emotional attraction." We guess we could call what Jim does ... dog-lovin'
Crimson847 wrote:In other words, transgender-friendly privacy laws don't molest people, people molest people.
(Presumably, the only way to stop a bad guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law is a good guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law, and thus transgender-friendly privacy law rights need to be enshrined in the Constitution as well)
Crimson847 wrote:In other words, transgender-friendly privacy laws don't molest people, people molest people.
(Presumably, the only way to stop a bad guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law is a good guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law, and thus transgender-friendly privacy law rights need to be enshrined in the Constitution as well)
iMURDAu wrote:How difficult was it to not yell "yeeeeeeeeaaaaaaaahhhhhhhh boooooooooooiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii" into the phone?
Crimson847 wrote:In other words, transgender-friendly privacy laws don't molest people, people molest people.
(Presumably, the only way to stop a bad guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law is a good guy with a transgender-friendly privacy law, and thus transgender-friendly privacy law rights need to be enshrined in the Constitution as well)
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests