Aquila89 wrote:The second article I quoted directly cited voat rules. I quote them again: "Do not post anyone under the assumed age of 16 fully nude. If they are younger please post them with some key areas covered."
Did the article just made that up, or the rules were also a result of an SJW attack on voat?
Again, that's not child porn.
Secondly, it's kind of difficult to phrase it in a way that covers exactly what you want without banning something ridiculous. Is an underage girl in a bikini "sexualized"? Is a naked child in a bathtub child porn?
But I do not support any attack on voat. If all the redditors who are outraged because their freedom to post creepshots and hate on fat people have been violated migrate over there, maybe reddit will become tolerable.
You misunderstand. They're not getting rid of "harassers" or "haters". Only specific groups, for whatever reason. You should never expect rules to be applied equally.
This is why subreddits like Coontown hasn't been banned.